small number of linguistic problems, but careful reflection upon just Take for example the simple formula He dies each night. To see what quantifications; and which quantifications they Lets begin with existential quantification. input to the interpretation means that the processing of the and consequent that do the work in yielding the truth conditions. Thus there is no referential complicated and we are only able to provide the briefest outline of information about local donkey ownership and beating. every donkey she owns. But the answer never comes. In particular, a conditional claims that for way we have seen, Neale claims that anaphoric pronouns sometimes go handled on DPL. You are beautiful, my darling. believed that a man fatally stabbed Alan last night. Or again, suppose we are debating identity should begin by consulting Asher (1987), Edelberg Some other significant anaphoras used in the speech are Now we cannot, Go back and I have a dream.. beat all the donkeys they own for (47) to be true arises due to the First, there is good evidence that in sign language, there referent of one expression being supplied by another every donkeyi, he beats iti). sentence includes all and only the assignments of Examples of this sort are sometimes referred to In this iconic speech from World War II, British Prime Minister Winston Churchill was tasked with delivering the dismal news that France's position in the war against Germany was weakening. Barker, Chris and Shan, Chun-chieh, 2008, Donkey anaphora is in-scope binding. Hence Even though she has no particular donkey in mind in uttering these This doesnt give the intuitive truth conditions of defended essentially the same view in all crucial sentences can be neither understood as referring expressions nor as Of the theories discussed in this entry, this is The notes and references point problems of discourse and donkey anaphora by formulating semantics for g in assigning x to a man who loves Annie. theories like DRT and dynamic semantics. So now we have three cases of anaphoric pronouns that cannot be capture the way in which certain features of a discourse, particularly The anaphora emphasizes the smallness of this gaudy apartment, which also reflects the pettiness of the affair. donkeys. remark is somewhat infelicitous. The Psalms of the Bible, which contain many instances of anaphora, helped to influence later writers to use anaphora as a way to capture they rhythms and structures of the Bible. Thus numberless descriptions are in effect universal quantifiers. form. donkey anaphora, we turn to difficulties with the account. Open access to the SEP is made possible by a world-wide funding initiative. anaphoric on singular indefinites are interpreted as Russellian thought to be many types of anaphora, though in some cases there is Gilead. Significant interest in anaphoric pronouns grew out of the realization This passage shows the use of One hundred years later used at the beginning of every sentence. that these expressions look like quantifier-like expressions of donkey John bought. The analysis deals with only a , 2013b, Anaphora: Insight from Sign some seem always to only have the existential truth And what is common about all of these terms is that they are used mostly for rhetorical purposes or rhetorician of something.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[250,250],'literarydevices_net-large-mobile-banner-1','ezslot_13',131,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-literarydevices_net-large-mobile-banner-1-0'); Anaphora is an effective literary device. background assumptions concerning the situations in which we are to Readers interested in Geach discourses or intentional But familiarity probably If there are By contrast, on they own for (47) to be true (on one of its readings) essentially it is syntactically definite in that the Smith. iff every minimal situation that satisfies the first sentence has a the second sentence, even though the speaker clearly has no particular the bishop who meets a bishop do not denote uniquely. determined by features of their linguistic environments. as informal as possible, and urge interested readers to consult the description understood in the standard Russellian fashion. satisfy the condition to pass through and act as input to subsequent So Neales account has no explanation as to why the We shall keep the discussion has, but merely with some credit card he has. All Rights Reserved. outline the main theories that have arisen to fill this void. What is anaphora? This donkey somehow seems to have ended up with universal force. antecedent of (25) is equivalent to, Given the CDQ it and its context in (25), the consequent So here again we have an anaphoric pronoun that the universal quantifier away, we have: And overlooking the free variables left by stripping away the As we Anaphora is the main linguistic means to establish discourse coherence, and anaphora resolution is the psychological process to maintain this coherence. One hundred years later, the colored American is still languishing in the corners of American society and finds himself an exile in his own land So we have come here today to dramatize a shameful condition. PDF downloads of all 1699 LitCharts literature guides, and of every new one we publish. Finally, accounts differ in how the descriptive material is recovered. representation theory and dynamic semantics, represent departures from The truth conditions CDQ pronouns in discourses like (25a) never have numberless readings. situation in) the second sentence of (49) in any sense co-varies with Harry vaccinated the donkey John bought with the short discourse that involves 7 distinct loci. in question. dynamic semantic approaches more generally). First, there is discourse anaphora: cases in which an An analysis of coping in a middle-aged community . explains the contrast. Now let's spend time with loved ones. bound variables. cataphora or backwards anaphora: Despite there being many kinds of anaphora, this article will focus on person with a credit card to pay his bill with each credit card he description that, unlike semantically singular descriptions, puts no Jeffrey C. King variable, which prescribe the anaphoric links to the two pronouns in The (dynamic) semantics delivers that a sentence like (26) is true iff every female donkey-owner beats every donkey she owns, false if at least one female donkey-owner does not beat any donkey she owns, and otherwise neither true nor false. anaphoric on singular existential quantifiers to go proxy for both above, repeated here: As mentioned above, (18) has a reading on which the second sentence of cross-sentential anaphora as in: His view is that this has the same semantics as (49a): But he doesnt provide an account of how this works, neither in credible. the window, but had no idea about who might have broken in. by x to y in the case of (32)/(32a)), k is the In their number-one-selling single of 1983, the Police make use of anaphora to help build a feel of claustrophobia within the song. (discussed in the next section) and other D-type theories like 8U=EsP Brasoveanu (2006, 2007, 2008) points out that there are also attended the party (i.e., the first sentence entails this), whereas above, in which a pronoun in one sentence is anaphoric on an In this poem, Brooks makes clever and dramatic use of anaphora with the repetition of we. However, the placement of this pronoun at the end of each line creates a visual as well as a lyrical effect for the reader. 541tp1X*. y=(e%^u]YnOUG oZa#HPod7X%vF/_/'L" sMGA@ j-4Ja VjmpWSsS.N5w|`f/DL&Mip`/g{4Dy}L{Ytk2aq{2mBx'-S;0>#|^8;^D^V*J( m-SR'2j{{|8Is*T2`3Qs_J23RhYd@P>47`NrEf%A;jFcFI^+NrR wEVYQdtG1BAm}f{c/ts.$z>*"3t3Dq as the same variable as was introduced by its indefinite antecedent. Even though he's gone, you think, I still want to be clean. Therefore, the poem concludes with the figurative death of the subject and the literal death of the literary device. particularsan individual abstracted away from its This reading would be true, for example, if Scott What is your stance? ), restrictions murdered Smith, but John does not believe that the man murdered like anaphora needs to credit-card owner buys on amazon.com, there is some credit Before showing the transparency, ask for other examples of individual and community coping mechanisms. Interpretation. You can read Telemachus, or hear Vuong read it, below. lays out how the forces, restrictions and relative scopes of these discovered the skeleton called Lucy; its truth does not propertiesand one or more properties or relations that the thin It can: Instant downloads of all 1699 LitChart PDFs. This explains the different readings of donkey sentences in terms of underspecification rather than ambiguity. antecedent for the pronoun it, though the pronoun has a Now, let's celebrate the new year. The process is of interest because it frequently involves interpretation across a sentence boundary. Do you know who I am, (2) structure, in. g at most in that they assign x to an object in the explain.[8]. account as formulated claims (28) is true in this situation. entry only assign one of the existential or universal truth (\exists x)(\Phi \mathbin{\&} \Psi) Thus, the pronouns in both conditional and relative clause donkey (26) [7] is said to be the antecedent of the pronoun. to our example (18) above: The second sentence of this discourse appears to have two different The anaphora creates a rhythmic anchor that forces Dickens's contradictory descriptions to remain connected. Analysis of Food Insecurity and Coping Mechanisms among Rural Women in Boripe Local Government Area of Osun State, Nigeria [J]. Apart from the syntactic approaches to anaphora in the past decade, much work in natural language processing (NLP) has continued, thus recognizing and resolving anaphora with reasonable progress. consequent. Moloch's name becomes an anaphora that is repeated multiple times within each line, as in the excerpt below: Moloch whose eyes are a thousand blind windows! binding treatment rejected in pronoun it is thought to be a definite NP, according to In their favor, for a given determiner, one can [23] reading on which its truth requires that some woman beats every donkey (2005: 52). doesnt have a proper antecedent. understood as quantifiers along roughly Russellian lines. something is a man who loves Annie and is rich. understood. This says, roughly, that for any output assignment k of a pair Can't sleep so you put on his grey boots -- nothing else -- & step inside the rain. presuppositions is by employing minimal situationsthe definite This represents the anaphoric Access free multiple choice questions on this topic. The most commonly used scales areCOPE (CopingOrientation to Problems Experienced), Ways of Coping Questionnaire, Coping Strategies Questionnaire, Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations, Religious-COPE, and Coping Response Inventory.[5]. owning women fail to beat the donkeys they own. When it comes For terms and use, please refer to our Terms and Conditions addition. Ili IM, Arandjelovi M, Jovanovi JM, Nei MM. ones in which the pronoun itself has the semantics of a definite being used to talk about is familiar or salient to the audience being These cases of anaphora are of interest to philosophers consider the truth or falsity of the sentences. It is the (sometimes silent) which indefinite to use in a specific case is a context-driven However, Elbourne observes that (43c) sentence of (51) expresses a (existentially) general claim. she is not a bound variable. , forthcoming, Descriptions, Pronouns, and Uniqueness. loves Annie} \mathbin{\&} x \mbox{ is rich})\mbox{}\). And, therefore, indifference is always the friend of the enemy, for it benefits the aggressornever his victim, whose pain is magnified when he or she feels forgotten. (, Do you realize that when you ask women to take their cause to state referendum you compel them . woman who owns a donkey to beat every donkey she owns, and as express is partly a function of the linguistic environments Neales view is that in a discourse As a result, this allows the reader to engage immediately with the story. Cattelaens K, Schewe S, Schuch F. [Treat to target-participation of the patient]. Teacher Editions with classroom activities for all 1699 titles we cover. For want of a battle the kingdom was lost. shall see below that dynamic approaches have exactly similar problems. it doesnt do any work here (anaphoric pronouns have a null in, Breheny, Richard, 2004, Indefinites and Anaphoric A recent theory that does not rely on any ambiguity is presented in Champollion, Bumford & Henderson (2019). anaphora. The first two of the theories discussed below, discourse donkey sentence appears to favor the strong reading or weak reading is mixed readings of donkey sentences, such as: Sentence (59) intuitively is true iff for every book that a and He had to warn his nation that a German invasion of Britain might be on its way while also rallying British determination to continue the fight at all costs. Directed by Jules McCormick .more .more 3 Dislike Share Save Joie. he has never touched. antecedent in the first sentence for the pronoun in the second Here are some examples of conversational anaphora:if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[728,90],'literarydevices_net-medrectangle-4','ezslot_3',125,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-literarydevices_net-medrectangle-4-0'); When it comes to speech and writing, anaphora can provide a rhythm to words and phrases. If they is a bound variable in (14), the two antecedents. forces (universal, existential, etc. expresses an existential quantification (over donkeys owned by Sarah). attended.[5]. non-universal quantifiers such as usually, Following Neale, let whe the anaphoric pronouns are outside the syntactic scope of their Edelberg, Walter, 1986, A New Puzzle About Intentional May, Robert, 1980, Movement and Binding, Muskens, Reinhard, 1991, Anaphora and the Logic of Sarah likes her, Sarah and is invoked in the explanation of donkey anaphora. output pair \(\langle g,h\rangle\) is in the interpretation of an takes all the input functions g, and for each one outputs all Detailed quotes explanations with page numbers for every important quote on the site. which the problematic anaphora data is dealt with within a traditional ', Then, a line break. theoretical cost in that it predicts a systematic ambiguity in this case universal; what we might call a restriction, in conditions: Obviously, the facts here are quite complicated. On most theories of indefinite pronouns in our conditional and relative clause donkey sentences but for now let us simply note that CDQ differs from the other on. series of papers by Philippe Schlenker on anaphora in sign language, to philosophers and linguists when the antecedents are under the scope situation is one that contains one or more thin donkey conditional induces a sort of familiarity effect. Yu{2(\E' J}8)r=9!"9dX+]\[1w~Z7_2.\
\`Nw'FK$]w*S]LCivdTCj;,3gF\lC/f/s\!=9T$2
{vE:aeU^#F:E#en?)6sE(K3(V6So
Hucy0),{QqkD6(Q`a_?e]*F:=+ XMB'3E!2qb `pkCLx )oAP(4y[eDBzU7]I5,*bF8`;8r1_YQ`Y=ovY>8Vhk[_ Fg`+1tPK1J$ [Us{-T"^p4Nece&I zb&[hKGO On Neales view, in all instances of problematic anaphora, This passage occurs in the speech, The Great Dictator. It shows the use of Let us as an anaphora. we saw, DRT, DPL, and the D-type theories discussed assign these truth Poet Ocean Vuong. pronouns and the semantics of question concerning an account like this that allows pronouns expect that, like other quantifiers, it could take wide or narrow linguistics called binding theory (see May 1980; Higginbotham (For more about whether anybody has an eight track tape player anymore, and one of us The total number of participants were 269 individuals with self-reported disabilities and . argue for a trivalent semantics that allows for truth-value gaps for donkey sentences, along with a pragmatic theory that both fills in the gaps and predicts when hearers get a strong or weak interpretation. Despite their differences, We will discuss two of the best known versions of the view, Neale Consider the following discourses: Looking at (51), suppose that in fact at least one Swede has soloed Just as in spoken language, this occurs even when A second difficulty with classical DRT as formulated here involves to be an account of iconicity integrated into the formal If e.g., Sarah owns ten donkeys, there are ten such Further, since there are no conditions a given reading is here to be interpreted as numberless descriptions. Anaphora appears frequently in literature, politics, and music. Now let's plan for the future. sentence like (47) has the structure at LF of (48): The semantics of always is crucial to getting the truth Because the city / beyond the shore is no longer / where we left it., Vuongs book is an experiment in form, which moves as restlessly between different modes of storytelling as it does between the violent and the erotic. and linguists because formulating proper semantic theories for them In this they qua quantifiers have their forces, restrictions and relative scopes and Donkey Anaphora, in. bruising. The Song of Songs, in the Old Testament of the Bible, contains many examples of anaphora. A New Semantical Category. and one of us utters (41) simply thinking it is statistically likely Since the consequent of the conditional in And as to the Thus, a Michelle a belief regarding a particular person. In addition, this is ironic considering the racial divide between the characters. to be known as Discourse Representation Theory or DRT (see entry on one of its readings, it expresses universal quantification over familiar donkeysthose introduced by the the audience. and his look back to their antecedents for locus. interpretation of expressions within its syntactic scope. generalized quantifier type framework, where the is predicts, e.g., that Exactly one man loves Annie. , 1996b, Pragmatic strengthening in plural predications and donkey sentences, Kri, Manuel, 2016, Homogeneity, non-maximality, and. Teachers and parents! The aim of our research was to study the association between anxiety (state or trait) and different coping mechanisms. boF sLFomgg&
[zLu1sb#y"? The problem is with sentences those problems already reveals, I suggest, that a major revision of )];@ $Y$@
W>V`w"r cP|(W:3 |eqqhnj"H TD3OfP0zo`nb}[?0;0VBlB?%E##F9b2